Despite popular opinion, lawyers and judges are human and sometimes the facts of a case make it near impossible for judges to play the role of the modest umpire calling balls and strikes described by Chief Justice Roberts in his confirmation hearing. Sometimes, bad facts make bad law because the plaintiff is so sympathetic that the just ruling may not be the "right" one. Fachon v. U.S. Food and Drug Administration et al., appears to be the epitome of this.
Earlier this year, a 20-year old man, Eugene Neil Fachon, was diagnosed with Diffuse Intrinsic Pontine Glioma ("DIPG") a form of brain ...
Blog Editors
Recent Updates
- Last Call for Comments on the Bipartisan Discussion Draft of the SUSTAIN Act: Shaping 340B for the Future
- Indiana Senate Enrolled Act 9 Requires Written Notice of Health Care Entities’ Mergers or Acquisitions
- Connecticut Bill Calls for Office of Health Strategy to Develop a Plan Regarding Private Equity Firms in Health Care
- Revised OCR Guidance Provides New Examples, but Raises More Questions, Regarding Use of Online Tracking Technologies by HIPAA Covered Entities and Business Associates
- FDA Releases Draft Guidance on New Dietary Ingredient Notification Procedures, Timelines