Categories: Provider

By Lori A. Medley

A recent decision from the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit held that collection or "dunning" letters sent after a debt has become time-barred by the applicable statute of limitations violate the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1692 et seq. ("FDCPA"), unless the dunning letters advise the debtor that the debt is no longer legally enforceable pursuant to the applicable statute of limitations.

In the consolidated appeals of McMahon v. LVNV Funding, LLC and Delgado v. Capital Management Services, Nos. 12-3504 & 13-2030, the Seventh Circuit examined two dunning letters that were sent to debtors well past the expiration of the applicable statutes of limitations.  While the debtors at issue each had "ironclad" limitations defenses to any potential lawsuit over the time-barred debts, the dunning letters failed to give any indication that the debts were time barred; instead, the letters offered the debtors a chance to settle the outstanding debt.  The Court deemed the dunning letters to be misleading in that they suggested that the debts were still legally enforceable.  Moreover, the offers of settlement contained in the dunning letters put the debtors in jeopardy as the acceptance of an offer of settlement could, in certain jurisdictions, inadvertently reset the limitations period, thus making the debtors vulnerable for the full amount of the debt. Thus, the Seventh Circuit found under that Circuit's "unsophisticated consumer" standard of review that dunning letters at issue were found to have violated the FDCPA's prohibitions on the use of "any false, deceptive, or misleading representation or means in connection with the collection of any debt" and the use of "unfair or unconscionable means to collect or attempt to collect any debt."  15 U.S.C. § 1692e, 1692f.

The Seventh Circuit's holding conflicts with the positions previously taken by the Third and Eighth Circuits, where those courts have found that sending dunning letters for time-barred debts does not violate the FDCPA unless the dunning letter actually threatens litigation.  See Huerta v. Galaxy Asset Management, 641 F.3d 28, 33 (3d Cir. 2011); Freyermuth v. Credit Bureau Services, Inc., 248 F.3d 767, 771 (8th Cir. 2001).

While the Seventh Circuit noted that its holding did not make the collection of time-barred debts "automatically improper" as "some people might consider full debt repayment a moral obligation," the decision emphasizes that collecting old debts can be difficult as the collection of time-barred debts could constitute a violation of the FDCPA if "the debt collector uses language in its dunning letter that would lead an unsophisticated consumer into believing that the debt is legally enforceable, regardless of whether the letter actually threatens litigation."  Thus, debt collectors and creditors need to take greater precautions when collecting old debts so as not to risk a violation of the FDCPA.  Precautions that can be instituted include: (1) determining before collection efforts are commenced whether the debt is time-barred by the applicable statute of limitations; (2) being aware of how the courts in the applicable jurisdiction have previously ruled on what constitutes a violation of the FDCPA when collecting time-barred debts; and (3) including, as suggested by the Seventh Circuit, "general language" in the dunning letters that there is the possibility that the debt being collected is time-barred.

Back to Health Law Advisor Blog

Search This Blog

Blog Editors

Related Services



Jump to Page


Sign up to receive an email notification when new Health Law Advisor posts are published:

Privacy Preference Center

When you visit any website, it may store or retrieve information on your browser, mostly in the form of cookies. This information might be about you, your preferences or your device and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to. The information does not usually directly identify you, but it can give you a more personalized web experience. Because we respect your right to privacy, you can choose not to allow some types of cookies. Click on the different category headings to find out more and change our default settings. However, blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience of the site and the services we are able to offer.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable information.

Performance Cookies

These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not know when you have visited our site, and will not be able to monitor its performance.