Posts tagged Spalding & Son Inc. v. United States.
Blogs
4 minute read
Imagine these scenarios:
- Your company cannot perform a contract because of the COVID-19 pandemic.
- A vendor informs you that she cannot provide your company with necessary goods because of supply chain issues caused by a governmental emergency declaration.
- A subcontractor cannot perform because its employees are self-quarantining.
These are not hypotheticals. Scenarios like these are playing out around the country. The real-world impact of the COVID-19 pandemic is colliding with contractual requirements, and there is new attention to the legal doctrines of “impossibility,” “frustration of purpose,” “impracticability, and “force majeure.”
What do they mean? In a nutshell, traditional contract law says that an unforeseeable event occurring after the contract was formed can excuse contract performance, and determining whether an event was unforeseeable will depend heavily on the specific facts and the language of the contract.
Blog Editors
Recent Updates
- State Insurance Department Statements Scrutinize MA and MedSupp Unfair Trade Practices
- DOJ Subpoena Seeks Health Information of Hospital Patients Receiving Gender-Affirming Care: Will Judge Grant Motion to Quash?
- Podcast: 42 CFR Part 2 Final Rule: What’s Changing and What Do You Need to Know? – Diagnosing Health Care
- Congress Creates Yet Another Cliff for Medicare Telehealth Extensions (and We’re Running Out of Metaphors)
- OIRA Memo on Agency Deregulation: Implications for Health Care