When I was working on my Masters in data science, one of the projects I did was to create an algorithm that would take an intended use statement for a medical device and predict whether FDA would require a clinical trial. It worked fairly well, with accuracy of about 95%.
Since that’s a dynamic algorithm in which the user inputs an intended use statement and gets a prediction of FDA’s decision, I wanted to go about a similar task this month: create a static word cloud to show what words are most associated with intended use statements where FDA has required a clinical trial. At least in theory, this static representation might give you a sense of words in an intended use statement that are more likely to push your device toward a clinical trial.
Introduction
Hardly a day goes by when we don’t see some media report of health care providers experimenting with machine learning, and more recently with generative AI, in the context of patient care. The allure is obvious. But the question is, to what extent do health care providers need to worry about FDA requirements as they use AI?
Blog Editors
Recent Updates
- DOJ Civil Division Announces 2025 Priorities: Promises “Aggressive” False Claims Act Enforcement of Civil Rights Violations and “Impermissible” Gender-Affirming Care
- HealthBench: Exploring Its Implications and Future in Health Care
- Navigating the Legal Risks of Consumer Protection Claims in Healthcare
- Oregon SB 951, Regulating the Corporate Practice of Medicine, Is Signed into Law—But Changes May Be in the Works Already
- CMS Doubles Down on Medicare Advantage Recoupment: Announces Aggressive RADV Strategy to Reclaim Billions