On Friday, June 14, the Texas Supreme Court declined to consider a case that asked the Court to determine whether frozen embryos are persons or property under Texas law.
In response to the recent turmoil caused by the Alabama Supreme Court’s February 16th ruling in LePage et al., v. The Center for Reproductive Medicine et al. and Burdick-Aysenne et al., v. The Center for Reproductive Medicine et al. that pre-embryos are human children for the purposes of advancing a wrongful death claim, the Alabama legislature enacted a law intended to shield those who “provide or receive goods or services related to in vitro fertilization [(“IVF”)]” from any “action, suit, or criminal prosecution for the damage to or death of an embryo[.]” AL SB ...
Blog Editors
Recent Updates
- U.S. Supreme Court to Weigh Induced Infringement Case Regarding ‘Generic Version of Vascepa®’
- Closer Look at H.R. 7291: What the “GRAS Oversight and Transparency Act” Could Mean for Dietary Supplements
- Diagnostic Imaging Interoperability Request for Information Shines a Spotlight on the Lack of Patient-Centered Longitudinal Health Records
- DOJ Deputy Assistant Attorney General Addresses FCA Enforcement Priorities and Reinforces Commitment to Robust Enforcement
- Interested in Opening a Medical Spa? (Part III): Here’s (More) That You Need to Know