Introduction
Let’s say FDA proposed a guidance document that would change the definition of “low cholesterol” for health claims. Now let’s say that when FDA finalized the guidance, instead of addressing that topic, FDA banned Beluga caviar. If you are interested in Beluga caviar, would you think you had adequate opportunity to comment? Would you care if FDA argued that Beluga caviar was high in cholesterol so the two documents were related?
Blog Editors
Recent Updates
- A Step Closer to the Proposed End of the Self-Affirmed GRAS Pathway
- Imports and the DOJ’s Trade Fraud Task Force: Considerations for the Health Care and Life Sciences Industries
- Federal Appellate Court Upholds Mississippi 340B Contract Pharmacy Protections
- DOJ False Claims Act Priorities: Cybersecurity Is Still on the Radar
- DOJ Launches Cross-Agency Trade Fraud Task Force: What Importers and Businesses Need to Know