Despite popular opinion, lawyers and judges are human and sometimes the facts of a case make it near impossible for judges to play the role of the modest umpire calling balls and strikes described by Chief Justice Roberts in his confirmation hearing. Sometimes, bad facts make bad law because the plaintiff is so sympathetic that the just ruling may not be the "right" one. Fachon v. U.S. Food and Drug Administration et al., appears to be the epitome of this.
Earlier this year, a 20-year old man, Eugene Neil Fachon, was diagnosed with Diffuse Intrinsic Pontine Glioma ("DIPG") a form of brain ...
Blog Editors
Recent Updates
- OIG Limits Sign-On Bonuses to In-Home Family Caregivers
- Governing Health AI Development and Adoption: Insights from HHS’s Recently Announced Strategy to Promote AI in Healthcare
- Stranger Things: New FDA Updates Flip Expectations for the Med Tech Industry in 2026 Upside Down
- The DOJ’s Bulk Sensitive Data Rule and Your Obligation to “Know Your Vendor”
- ACCESS Model: CMMI’s New Technology-Enabled Chronic Care Model