Posts tagged employment litigation.
Blogs
3 minute read
In employment litigation, plaintiffs often rely on the “cat’s paw” doctrine to hold their employers liable for discriminatory or retaliatory animus of a supervisory employee who influenced, but did not make, the ultimate employment decision. On August 29, 2016, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, in Vasquez v. Empress Ambulance Service, Inc., greatly extended the reach of the “cat’s paw,” holding that the doctrine could be applied to hold an employer liable for an adverse employment decision that was influenced by the discriminatory or ...
Blog Editors
Recent Updates
- Brand Licensing in Health Care: An Overview for Hospitals
- FDA Proposal Would Extend Food Traceability Rule’s Compliance Deadline to July 2028
- NYDFS Cybersecurity Crackdown: New Requirements Now in Force, and "Covered Entities" Include HMOs, CCRCs—Are You Compliant?
- The Case for Regular Legal Maintenance: A Litigation Readiness Mindset for Modern Health Care Organizations
- The Rising Threats of Multi-Modal and Agentic AI in Cyber Attacks