In 2010, as part of the Affordable Care Act, Congress resolved a highly litigated issue about whether a violation of the Anti-Kickback Statute (AKS) can serve as a basis for liability under the federal False Claims Act (FCA). Specifically, Congress amended the AKS to state that a “claim that includes items or services resulting from a violation of [the AKS] constitutes a false or fraudulent claim for purposes of the [FCA].”
This amendment, however, did not end the debate over the relationship between the AKS and the FCA. Over the last several years, multiple courts have been called upon to interpret what it means for a claim to “result from” a violation of the AKS. Courts across the country are split on the correct standard. On February 18, 2025, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit joined the Sixth and Eight Circuits in adopting a stricter “but-for” standard of causation—while the Third Circuit has previously declared that the government must merely prove a causal connection between an illegal kickback and a claim being submitted for reimbursement.
Blog Editors
Recent Updates
- Brand Licensing in Health Care: An Overview for Hospitals
- FDA Proposal Would Extend Food Traceability Rule’s Compliance Deadline to July 2028
- NYDFS Cybersecurity Crackdown: New Requirements Now in Force, and "Covered Entities" Include HMOs, CCRCs—Are You Compliant?
- The Case for Regular Legal Maintenance: A Litigation Readiness Mindset for Modern Health Care Organizations
- The Rising Threats of Multi-Modal and Agentic AI in Cyber Attacks