Introduction
Let’s say FDA proposed a guidance document that would change the definition of “low cholesterol” for health claims. Now let’s say that when FDA finalized the guidance, instead of addressing that topic, FDA banned Beluga caviar. If you are interested in Beluga caviar, would you think you had adequate opportunity to comment? Would you care if FDA argued that Beluga caviar was high in cholesterol so the two documents were related?
Blog Editors
Recent Updates
- Podcast: Current Tailwinds in Women’s Health - What Do They Mean for Your Business? – Diagnosing Health Care
- Novel AI Laws Target Companion AI and Mental Health
- EDPA Ramps Up Its White-Collar Enforcement Framework
- California Governor Signs AB 1415 Compromise Legislation Regulating Private Equity and Hedge Fund Activity
- DOJ’s Final Rule on Bulk Data Transfers: The First 180 Days