Introduction
Let’s say FDA proposed a guidance document that would change the definition of “low cholesterol” for health claims. Now let’s say that when FDA finalized the guidance, instead of addressing that topic, FDA banned Beluga caviar. If you are interested in Beluga caviar, would you think you had adequate opportunity to comment? Would you care if FDA argued that Beluga caviar was high in cholesterol so the two documents were related?
Blog Editors
Recent Updates
- First Circuit Clarifies When Clinical Labs Can Rely on Physician Orders
- Understanding the False Claims Act Statute of Limitations—and the Debate Over the “Last Overt Act” Rule
- Podcast: The Down-Low on Data for Value-Based Enterprises and Their Participating Providers – Diagnosing Health Care
- Second Circuit Affirms Denial of Preliminary Injunction in Challenge To N.Y. Law Restricting Weight Loss and Muscle Building Supplement Sales to Minors
- The DOJ’s Bulk Sensitive Data Rule and Your Obligation to “Know Your Data”