Introduction
Let’s say FDA proposed a guidance document that would change the definition of “low cholesterol” for health claims. Now let’s say that when FDA finalized the guidance, instead of addressing that topic, FDA banned Beluga caviar. If you are interested in Beluga caviar, would you think you had adequate opportunity to comment? Would you care if FDA argued that Beluga caviar was high in cholesterol so the two documents were related?
Blog Editors
Recent Updates
- OIRA Memo on Agency Deregulation: Implications for Health Care
- Outside Counsel’s Internal Investigations—Including Those Relating to Health Care—Are Privileged and Protected from Disclosure
- Podcast: Current Tailwinds in Women’s Health - What Do They Mean for Your Business? – Diagnosing Health Care
- Novel AI Laws Target Companion AI and Mental Health
- EDPA Ramps Up Its White-Collar Enforcement Framework