Introduction
Let’s say FDA proposed a guidance document that would change the definition of “low cholesterol” for health claims. Now let’s say that when FDA finalized the guidance, instead of addressing that topic, FDA banned Beluga caviar. If you are interested in Beluga caviar, would you think you had adequate opportunity to comment? Would you care if FDA argued that Beluga caviar was high in cholesterol so the two documents were related?
Blog Editors
Recent Updates
- Podcast: Unveiling Gender-Affirming Care: Why It Matters and What’s at Stake – Diagnosing Health Care
- Importance of Negotiating Maintenance, Repair and Replacement Obligations in Health Care Leases
- Unpacking Averages: Assessing the Products Included in FDA's Voluntary Malfunction Summary Reporting Program
- Federal Update on Cannabis Scheduling: Are State Legalized Cannabis Dispensaries to Become Pharmacies?
- HHS Extends the Antidiscrimination Provisions of the Affordable Care Act to Patient Care Decision Support Tools, Including Algorithms