[caption id="attachment_2360" align="alignright" width="206"] Nathaniel M. Glasser and Daniel C. Fundakowski[/caption]
Last month, in United States ex rel. Helfer v. Associated Anesthesiologists of Springfield, Ltd., No. 3:10-cv-03076 (N.D. Ill. Jan. 14, 2016), the U.S. District Court for the Central District of Illinois held that the retaliation provision of the False Claims Act (“FCA”) requires a whistleblower to show that protected activity was the “but-for” cause of the alleged adverse action.
The FCA’s retaliation provision entitles an employee to ...
Blog Editors
Recent Updates
- Utah Law Aims to Regulate AI Mental Health Chatbots
- National Science Foundation (NSF) Imposes 15% Indirect Cost Rate Cap: What to Know
- New DOJ White Collar Priorities Focus on Health Care Fraud
- Federal Regulators Announce Non-Enforcement of the 2024 Rule for Mental Health Parity
- Will Colorado’s Historic AI Law Go Live in 2026? Its Fate Hangs in the Balance in 2025