Posts tagged Baker v. Aetna Life Insurance Co.
Blogs
5 minute read
Employers and health plans should be aware that two recent federal decisions have recognized that the non-discrimination provision in the Affordable Care Act prohibits discrimination on the basis of gender identity. Plans cannot categorically exclude coverage for procedures to treat gender dysphoria.
In Boyden v. Conlin, the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin found that the state’s exclusion of gender reassignment-related procedures from the state employees’ health insurance coverage constitutes sex discrimination in violation of Section 1557 ...
Blog Editors
Recent Updates
- DOJ Civil Division Accelerates Review of FCA Whistleblower Complaints Involving Federally Funded, State-Administered Benefits Programs
- FDA Warns Against “Over-Reliance” on AI Pharmaceutical Manufacturing . . . But How Much Reliance Is Too Much?
- Five Federal Cases Health Care and Life Sciences GCs Should Continue to Watch in 2026
- CMS Announces Nationwide Moratoria on New Medicare Enrollment for Hospices, Home Health Agencies
- Medicaid Behavioral Health Investigations and Payment Suspensions in D.C. Are Increasing – How Providers Can Limit Risk