Despite popular opinion, lawyers and judges are human and sometimes the facts of a case make it near impossible for judges to play the role of the modest umpire calling balls and strikes described by Chief Justice Roberts in his confirmation hearing. Sometimes, bad facts make bad law because the plaintiff is so sympathetic that the just ruling may not be the "right" one. Fachon v. U.S. Food and Drug Administration et al., appears to be the epitome of this.
Earlier this year, a 20-year old man, Eugene Neil Fachon, was diagnosed with Diffuse Intrinsic Pontine Glioma ("DIPG") a form of brain ...
Blog Editors
Recent Updates
- DOJ Subpoena Seeks Health Information of Hospital Patients Receiving Gender-Affirming Care: Will Judge Grant Motion to Quash?
- Podcast: 42 CFR Part 2 Final Rule: What’s Changing and What Do You Need to Know? – Diagnosing Health Care
- Congress Creates Yet Another Cliff for Medicare Telehealth Extensions (and We’re Running Out of Metaphors)
- OIRA Memo on Agency Deregulation: Implications for Health Care
- Outside Counsel’s Internal Investigations—Including Those Relating to Health Care—Are Privileged and Protected from Disclosure