Despite popular opinion, lawyers and judges are human and sometimes the facts of a case make it near impossible for judges to play the role of the modest umpire calling balls and strikes described by Chief Justice Roberts in his confirmation hearing. Sometimes, bad facts make bad law because the plaintiff is so sympathetic that the just ruling may not be the "right" one. Fachon v. U.S. Food and Drug Administration et al., appears to be the epitome of this.
Earlier this year, a 20-year old man, Eugene Neil Fachon, was diagnosed with Diffuse Intrinsic Pontine Glioma ("DIPG") a form of brain ...
Blog Editors
Recent Updates
- The AI Doctor Is Out? How California’s Ab 489 Could Limit AI Development in Healthcare
- Complex Billing and Reasonable Interpretations: Jury Was Entitled to Find Fraud in Doctor’s Upcoding of Speedy COVID-19 Tests, Fourth Circuit Says
- Governor Kotek Signs Oregon’s SB 537, Strengthening Workplace Violence Prevention in Health Care
- From Best Practices to Enforcement: Decoding DOJ’s July 29 Anti-Discrimination Guidance
- HRSA Seeks Applicants to Test 340B Rebate Model Pilot Program