Despite popular opinion, lawyers and judges are human and sometimes the facts of a case make it near impossible for judges to play the role of the modest umpire calling balls and strikes described by Chief Justice Roberts in his confirmation hearing. Sometimes, bad facts make bad law because the plaintiff is so sympathetic that the just ruling may not be the "right" one. Fachon v. U.S. Food and Drug Administration et al., appears to be the epitome of this.
Earlier this year, a 20-year old man, Eugene Neil Fachon, was diagnosed with Diffuse Intrinsic Pontine Glioma ("DIPG") a form of brain ...
Blog Editors
Recent Updates
- DOJ Civil Division Accelerates Review of FCA Whistleblower Complaints Involving Federally Funded, State-Administered Benefits Programs
- FDA Warns Against “Over-Reliance” on AI Pharmaceutical Manufacturing . . . But How Much Reliance Is Too Much?
- Five Federal Cases Health Care and Life Sciences GCs Should Continue to Watch in 2026
- CMS Announces Nationwide Moratoria on New Medicare Enrollment for Hospices, Home Health Agencies
- Medicaid Behavioral Health Investigations and Payment Suspensions in D.C. Are Increasing – How Providers Can Limit Risk