- Posts by Stephen R. Kleinman
Member of the FirmWhen hospital and physician leadership need advice on a broad array of medical staff, credentialing, peer review, and quality improvement issues, they turn to attorney Steve Kleinman.
His daily work includes advising hospitals ...
Background
On December 10, 2024, the Supreme Court of Ohio issued its decision in Stull v. Summa, a medical negligence case in which the defendants argued that Ohio’s statutory peer-review privilege protected from discovery the file the hospital maintained on a resident physician, which included, among other things, quality reviews and assessments of the resident’s clinical competency and professional conduct. The Supreme Court of Ohio decided one issue: Does the peer-review privilege in R.C. 2305.252 apply to a health care entity’s files about resident physicians?
This case arose from the medical treatment of head injuries that the patient sustained during a car crash. The patient and his guardians filed a medical negligence lawsuit against the hospital and its employed health care professionals, including a resident physician who participated in the patient’s care. The plaintiffs alleged that the resident improperly intubated the patient, causing the patient to sustain a brain injury.
Blog Editors
Recent Updates
- Closer Look at H.R. 7291: What the “GRAS Oversight and Transparency Act” Could Mean for Dietary Supplements
- Diagnostic Imaging Interoperability Request for Information Shines a Spotlight on the Lack of Patient-Centered Longitudinal Health Records
- DOJ Deputy Assistant Attorney General Addresses FCA Enforcement Priorities and Reinforces Commitment to Robust Enforcement
- Interested in Opening a Medical Spa? (Part III): Here’s (More) That You Need to Know
- IRS Issues Guidance Regarding Group Exemption Letters