- Posts by Spreeha ChoudhuryAssociate
Holding both Doctor of Pharmacy and Juris Doctor degrees, attorney Spreeha Choudhury brings a valuable combination of experience to Epstein Becker Green. She is adept at helping clients navigate the complex intersections of ...
Drug manufacturer Eli Lilly has filed suit against four companies involved in making, prescribing, and/or selling compounded versions of its weight loss and diabetes drugs ZEPBOUND® and MOUNJARO®. Lilly’s drugs, injected under the skin, are the only FDA-approved medicines containing tirzepatide in the United States.
Two complaints, filed April 23 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, contend that the founders and chief executive officers of Mochi Health Corp. (“Mochi Health”) and Fella Health exerted control over multiple affiliated entities, including medical groups, in violation of California law prohibiting unlicensed individuals and corporations from practicing medicine (generally known as the “Corporate Practice of Medicine” or “CPOM” laws). The plaintiffs allege unfair competition and false advertising under state law and the Lanham Act; and assert state CPOM claims through supplemental and/or diversity jurisdiction.
This latest development on the drug compounding front comes at a time when states are keeping a sharp eye on private investment in the health care space—increasingly proposing legislation to strengthen CPOM laws and also increase oversight on corporate transactions involving health care entities. The majority of U.S. states have some form of CPOM restriction, and some, including Oregon, Texas, and Washington, are considering taking steps advocates say will strengthen theirs—with proposals, for example, to prevent private equity groups or hedge funds from interfering with health care decisions and limiting or eliminating common forms of affiliation with professional medical practices.
During the past several turbulent weeks for the U.S. health care system, rulings in the case Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine v. FDA have called into question the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s (“FDA’s”) scientific review process to approve new drug applications. While the U.S. Supreme Court acted on the afternoon of Friday, April 21, 2023 to preserve access to the drug mifepristone while the case continues in the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, the future of mifepristone—and the FDA’s authority to approve new drugs—will continue to be debated on appeal.
Blog Editors
Recent Updates
- The AI Doctor Is Out? How California’s AB 489 Could Limit AI Development in Healthcare
- Complex Billing and Reasonable Interpretations: Jury Was Entitled to Find Fraud in Doctor’s Upcoding of Speedy COVID-19 Tests, Fourth Circuit Says
- Governor Kotek Signs Oregon’s SB 537, Strengthening Workplace Violence Prevention in Health Care
- From Best Practices to Enforcement: Decoding DOJ’s July 29 Anti-Discrimination Guidance
- HRSA Seeks Applicants to Test 340B Rebate Model Pilot Program