<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
			<?xml-stylesheet type='text/xsl' href='https://www.healthlawadvisor.com/rss.xsl' ?>
			<rss version='2.0' xmlns:content='http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/'
					xmlns:atom='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'
					xmlns:dc='http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/'>
				<channel>
					<title>Health Law Advisor - Laws and Regulations Affecting Health Care and Life
Sciences - Featuring HEAL® | Epstein Becker Green</title>
					<link>https://www.healthlawadvisor.com/author/sarah-m-hall</link>
					<atom:link href='https://www.healthlawadvisor.com/author/sarah-m-hall?rss' rel='self' type='application/rss+xml' />
					<description><![CDATA[The latest updates to Health Law Advisor - Laws and Regulations Affecting Health Care and Life Sciences - Featuring HEAL®.]]></description>
					<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2026 00:00:02 -0700</lastBuildDate>
					
				<item>
				<title>"Enough is Enough": HHS-OIG Freezes Funds for New York Medicaid Fraud
Control Unit, Effective July 1</title>
				<link>https://www.healthlawadvisor.com/enough-is-enough-hhs-oig-freezes-funds-for-new-york-medicaid-fraud-control-unit-effective-july-1</link>
<dc:creator>Melissa L. Jampol, Sarah M. Hall, Allison R. Ness</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink='false'>enough-is-enough-hhs-oig-freezes-funds-for-new-york-medicaid-fraud-control-unit-effective-july-1</guid>

					<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2026 09:00:01 -0700</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>One week after the U.S. Department of Justice on June 23, 2026, announced the results of its annual <a href="https://www.healthlawadvisor.com/dojs-second-national-health-care-fraud-takedown-of-the-second-trump-administration-heavily-targets-medicaid-fraud">National Health Care Fraud Takedown</a>&mdash;taking aim at Medicaid fraud and partnering with all 50 state Medicaid Fraud Control Units (MFCUs)&mdash;the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Office of Inspector General (OIG) denied recertification for New York&rsquo;s MFCU and froze $60 million in annual federal funds for New York&rsquo;s MFCU, effective July 1.</p>]]></description>
</item>

				<item>
				<title>DOJ’s Second National Health Care Fraud Takedown of the Second Trump
Administration Heavily Targets Medicaid Fraud</title>
				<link>https://www.healthlawadvisor.com/dojs-second-national-health-care-fraud-takedown-of-the-second-trump-administration-heavily-targets-medicaid-fraud</link>
<dc:creator>Sarah M. Hall, Zachary S. Taylor, Elena M. Quattrone, Daniella R. Lee,
Jeremy A. Avila</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink='false'>dojs-second-national-health-care-fraud-takedown-of-the-second-trump-administration-heavily-targets-medicaid-fraud</guid>

					<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2026 17:45:00 -0700</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>On June 23, 2026, the U.S. Department of Justice (&ldquo;DOJ&rdquo;) <a href="https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/national-health-care-fraud-takedown-results-455-defendants-charged-connection-over-65">announced the results of the annual National Health Care Fraud Takedown</a> (&ldquo;2026 Takedown&rdquo;)&mdash;the first under DOJ&rsquo;s new <a href="https://www.commerciallitigationupdate.com/doj-creates-national-fraud-enforcement-division-what-it-means-for-fraud-enforcement-in-america">National Fraud Enforcement Division (&ldquo;NFED&rdquo;) announced on April 7</a>. This year, the 2026 Takedown charged 455 defendants in connection with more than $6.5 billion in alleged fraud.</p>
<p>Although much of the content of the prosecutions is the same as in past years (e.g. wound care, opioids), Medicaid fraud&mdash;long the province of state Medicaid Fraud Control Units (&ldquo;MFCUs&rdquo;)&mdash;featured prominently in the 2026 Takedown. DOJ claims to have charged the largest number of Medicaid fraud defendants and Medicaid fraud loss in DOJ history: 295 defendants and over $518 million in alleged false claims submitted to Medicaid. Per the DOJ press release, the MFCUs of all 50 states participated, the highest number ever.</p>]]></description>
</item>

				<item>
				<title>Medicaid Behavioral Health Investigations and Payment Suspensions in D.C.
Are Increasing – How Providers Can Limit Risk</title>
				<link>https://www.healthlawadvisor.com/medicaid-behavioral-health-investigations-and-payment-suspensions-in-d-c-are-increasing-how-providers-can-limit-risk</link>
<dc:creator>Sarah M. Hall, Chloe T. Hillard, Clifford E. Barnes</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink='false'>medicaid-behavioral-health-investigations-and-payment-suspensions-in-d-c-are-increasing-how-providers-can-limit-risk</guid>

					<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 09:00:03 -0700</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>Behavioral health providers in the District of Columbia (&ldquo;District&rdquo; or &ldquo;D.C.&rdquo;) are operating in an environment of heightened government scrutiny. In recent months, federal and District authorities have signaled an intensified focus on Medicaid fraud in the behavioral health space, combining criminal prosecutions by the U.S. Attorney&rsquo;s Office with aggressive program integrity actions by the D.C. Department of Health Care Finance (&ldquo;DHCF&rdquo;). These efforts have included criminal and civil investigations into alleged billing irregularities and, at an increasing rate, the suspension of Medicaid payments to providers based on suspected fraud. Such suspensions are implemented in almost all cases, as permitted by regulations, before any final determination on the merits. These developments raise significant legal, financial, and operational risks for behavioral health providers in D.C.</p>]]></description>
</item>

				<item>
				<title>DOJ’s West Coast Strike Force to Target Health Care Fraud in Arizona,
Nevada, and Northern California</title>
				<link>https://www.healthlawadvisor.com/dojs-west-coast-strike-force-to-target-health-care-fraud-in-arizona-nevada-and-northern-california</link>
<dc:creator>Sarah M. Hall, Jeremy A. Avila, Eric  Werner</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink='false'>dojs-west-coast-strike-force-to-target-health-care-fraud-in-arizona-nevada-and-northern-california</guid>

					<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2026 09:00:04 -0700</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>On April 30, 2026, the newly constituted National Fraud Enforcement Division (NFED) of the U.S. Department of Justice <a href="https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/fraud-division-launches-west-coast-strike-force-target-health-care-fraud-schemes-across">announced</a> the formation of a West Coast Health Care Fraud Strike Force. This new Strike Force combines the resources of DOJ&rsquo;s Health Care Fraud Unit (which was recently placed under operational control of NFED, as discussed below) and the U.S. Attorney&rsquo;s Offices (USAOs) for the Districts of Arizona, Nevada, and the Northern District of California.</p>]]></description>
</item>

				<item>
				<title>California Targeted in House Committee Investigation of Hospice Fraud</title>
				<link>https://www.healthlawadvisor.com/california-targeted-in-house-committee-investigation-of-hospice-fraud</link>
<dc:creator>Jeremy A. Avila, Sarah M. Hall, John M. Puente, Raja  Sékaran</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink='false'>california-targeted-in-house-committee-investigation-of-hospice-fraud</guid>

					<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2026 09:00:05 -0700</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>On March 23, 2026, the U.S. House of Representatives&rsquo; Committee on Oversight and Government Reform sent a <a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/Ltr-to-Newsom-re-hospice-fraud.pdf">letter</a> to California Governor Gavin Newsom requesting &ldquo;documents and communications&rdquo; surrounding the state&rsquo;s oversight of its federally funded hospice programs.</p>]]></description>
</item>

				<item>
				<title>DOJ Deputy Assistant Attorney General Addresses FCA Enforcement Priorities
and Reinforces Commitment to Robust Enforcement</title>
				<link>https://www.healthlawadvisor.com/doj-deputy-assistant-attorney-general-addresses-fca-enforcement-priorities-and-reinforces-commitment-to-robust-enforcement</link>
<dc:creator>Jason E. Christ, Sarah M. Hall, Thomas J. Jaworski</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink='false'>doj-deputy-assistant-attorney-general-addresses-fca-enforcement-priorities-and-reinforces-commitment-to-robust-enforcement</guid>

					<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2026 09:00:06 -0800</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>On February 19th, Brenna Jenny, Deputy Assistant Attorney General for the Commercial Litigation Branch at the U.S. Department of Justice, provided the keynote speech at the Federal Bar Association&rsquo;s <em>Qui Tam</em> Conference.</p>
<p>At this address, and in an earlier panel discussion centering on Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion programs (DEI), Jenny focused on False Claims Act (FCA) enforcement priorities and DOJ enforcement practices, including how DOJ identifies cases, when it might dismiss cases, and its approach to resolutions.</p>]]></description>
</item>

				<item>
				<title>Understanding the False Claims Act Statute of Limitations—and the Debate
Over the “Last Overt Act” Rule</title>
				<link>https://www.healthlawadvisor.com/understanding-the-false-claims-act-statute-of-limitations-and-the-debate-over-the-last-overt-act-rule</link>
<dc:creator>Bailey  Cremeans, Elena M. Quattrone, Elizabeth J. McEvoy, Sarah M. Hall</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink='false'>understanding-the-false-claims-act-statute-of-limitations-and-the-debate-over-the-last-overt-act-rule</guid>

					<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2025 15:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>The False Claims Act (FCA) is one of the federal government&rsquo;s most powerful tools for combatting healthcare fraud. Yet, as with any enforcement tool, its reach is constrained by a statute of limitations. The FCA statute of limitations provisions, set out in 31 U.S.C. &sect; 3731(b), are surprisingly nuanced and often depend on when the government learns of the alleged misconduct. In practice, this framework often favors the government, yet these nuances are worth unpacking, which we do below.</p>]]></description>
</item>

				<item>
				<title>Outside Counsel’s Internal Investigations—Including Those Relating to
Health Care—Are Privileged and Protected from Disclosure</title>
				<link>https://www.healthlawadvisor.com/outside-counsels-internal-investigations-including-those-relating-to-health-care-are-privileged-and-protected-from-disclosure</link>
<dc:creator>Sarah M. Hall</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink='false'>outside-counsels-internal-investigations-including-those-relating-to-health-care-are-privileged-and-protected-from-disclosure</guid>

					<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2025 16:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>In Summer 2025, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit issued a strongly worded decision in <em>In Re: FirstEnergy Corporation </em>(No. 24-3654)&mdash;confirming the core concept that internal investigations conducted by counsel and in anticipation of litigation are privileged and protected from disclosure. When securities plaintiffs in the case sweepingly sought all documents &ldquo;related to the internal investigation,&rdquo; the district court incorrectly ordered their production. After much legal wrangling, the Sixth Circuit <a href="https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.ca6.152070/gov.uscourts.ca6.152070.29.2.pdf">rebuked the district court on August 7, 2025</a>, and <a href="https://www.opn.ca6.uscourts.gov/opinions.pdf/25a0272p-06.pdf">reaffirmed in a <em>per curiam</em> opinion filed October 3, 2025</a>.&nbsp;</p>]]></description>
</item>

				<item>
				<title>The First National Health Care Fraud Takedown of the Second Trump
Administration: What Stayed the Same and What Is New?</title>
				<link>https://www.healthlawadvisor.com/the-first-national-health-care-fraud-takedown-of-the-second-trump-administration-what-stayed-the-same-and-what-is-new</link>
<dc:creator>Sarah M. Hall, Zachary S. Taylor</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink='false'>the-first-national-health-care-fraud-takedown-of-the-second-trump-administration-what-stayed-the-same-and-what-is-new</guid>

					<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2025 13:45:00 -0700</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>On June 30, 2025, the U.S. Department of Justice (&ldquo;DOJ&rdquo;), together with the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General (&ldquo;HHS OIG&rdquo;) and other law enforcement partners, announced the results of the <a href="https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/national-health-care-fraud-takedown-results-324-defendants-charged-connection-over-146">2025 National Health Care Fraud Takedown</a>&mdash;hailed as the largest in history.</p>
<p>This year, DOJ&rsquo;s Health Care Fraud Unit reported that 324 defendants were charged for their alleged involvement in various health care fraud schemes that involved over $14.6 billion in intended loss&mdash;more than doubling the prior record of $6 billion set in 2020 during the first Trump administration. By way of comparison, last year, the 2024 Takedown charged 193 defendants with allegedly committing more than $2.5 billion in fraud. And two years ago, the 2023 Takedown charged 78 defendants with more than $2.5 billion. To say there was a significant increase between the Biden administration and the second Trump administration would be an understatement. &nbsp;</p>
<p>That this administration would &ldquo;follow the money&rdquo; should not come as a surprise. As noted, the prior record was set during President Trump&rsquo;s first term in 2020. In that Takedown, DOJ and HHS OIG reported 345 defendants allegedly submitted more than $6 billion in false and fraudulent claims to federal health care programs and private payers. The bulk of that 2020 Takedown, $4.5 billion, was related to telehealth.</p>]]></description>
</item>

				<item>
				<title>DOJ Civil Rights Fraud Initiative: FCA Enforcement Expanding Into Alleged
Discrimination</title>
				<link>https://www.healthlawadvisor.com/doj-civil-rights-fraud-initiative-fca-enforcement-expanding-into-alleged-discrimination</link>
<dc:creator>George B. Breen, Sarah M. Hall, Alkida  Kacani, Frank C. Morris, Jr.</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink='false'>doj-civil-rights-fraud-initiative-fca-enforcement-expanding-into-alleged-discrimination</guid>

					<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2025 02:30:00 -0700</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>On May 19, 2025, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) <a href="https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/justice-department-establishes-civil-rights-fraud-initiative">announced</a> a new Civil Rights Fraud Initiative that will leverage the federal False Claims Act (FCA) to investigate and litigate against universities, contractors, health care providers, and other entities that accept federal funds but allegedly violate federal civil rights laws.</p>
<p>The initiative will be led jointly by the DOJ Civil Division&rsquo;s Fraud Section and the Civil Rights Division&mdash;with support from the Criminal Division, federal civil rights agencies, and state partners.&nbsp;</p>
<p>The initiative implements President Donald Trump&rsquo;s <a href="https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2025/01/31/2025-02097/ending-illegal-discrimination-and-restoring-merit-based-opportunity">Executive Order 14173</a>, &ldquo;Ending Illegal Discrimination and Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity&rdquo; (January 21, 2025), directing agencies to combat unlawful discrimination through the FCA, and complements Attorney General (AG) Bondi&rsquo;s February 5 <a href="https://www.justice.gov/ag/media/1388501/dl?inline">memorandum</a>, &ldquo;Ending Illegal DEI and DEIA Discrimination and Preferences.&rdquo;</p>]]></description>
</item>

				<item>
				<title>New DOJ White Collar Priorities Focus on Health Care Fraud</title>
				<link>https://www.healthlawadvisor.com/new-doj-white-collar-priorities-focus-on-health-care-fraud</link>
<dc:creator>Melissa L. Jampol, Thomas J. Jaworski, Sarah M. Hall</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink='false'>new-doj-white-collar-priorities-focus-on-health-care-fraud</guid>

					<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2025 11:10:00 -0700</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>On May 12, 2025, the U.S. Department of Justice&rsquo;s Criminal Division released a new guidance memo on white-collar enforcement priorities in the Trump Administration entitled <a href="https://www.justice.gov/criminal/media/1400046/dl?inline">&ldquo;<em>Focus, Fairness, and Efficiency in the Fight Against White-Collar Crime</em>.&rdquo;</a> In this memo, and the accompanying speech by Matthew R. Galeotti, the Trump &nbsp;Administration&rsquo;s appointed Head of the Criminal Division, the DOJ reiterated its previously stated commitment to prosecuting illegal immigration, drug cartels, and transnational criminal organizations. For the first time in the new Administration, however, the DOJ clearly articulated new white-collar enforcement priorities, directing Criminal Division white-collar prosecutors to follow three core tenets: focus, fairness, and efficiency. As detailed below, the new memo sets forth the following three priorities:</p>
<h2>1. Focus on High-Impact Waste, Fraud, and Abuse Harming Vulnerable Taxpayers</h2>
<p>It should be no surprise that the administration is targeting actors that profit through &ldquo;waste, fraud, and abuse.&rdquo; The memo sets clear priorities for its prosecutors to investigate, listing as the #1 priority health care fraud and federal program and procurement fraud. &nbsp;The memo goes on to provide a top 10 list of &ldquo;high-impact areas&rdquo;, with &ldquo;trade and customs fraud, including tariff evasion&rdquo; as #2. &nbsp;Heavy focus is given to fraud perpetrated by foreign actors and conduct threatening U.S. national security. Also listed is fraud victimizing U.S. investors, including elder fraud and Ponzi schemes. Appearing as #8 on the list is violations of the Controlled Substances Act and the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, including the creation of counterfeit pills laced with fentanyl and the &ldquo;unlawful distribution of opioids by medical professionals and companies.&rdquo;</p>]]></description>
</item>

				<item>
				<title>DOJ Brings Second Criminal Charges Related to Medicare Advantage Risk
Adjustment</title>
				<link>https://www.healthlawadvisor.com/doj-brings-second-criminal-charges-related-to-medicare-advantage-risk-adjustment</link>
<dc:creator>Sarah M. Hall, Jason E. Christ, Chloe T. Hillard</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink='false'>doj-brings-second-criminal-charges-related-to-medicare-advantage-risk-adjustment</guid>

					<pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2023 09:00:12 -0700</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>In an <a href="https://www.justice.gov/media/1321301/dl?inline">indictment</a> announced on October 26, 2023 in Miami, the U.S. Department of Justice, Criminal Division&rsquo;s Fraud Section, working with the FBI and HHS-OIG, brought what may be only the second federal criminal charges directly related to the Medicare Advantage (Medicare Part C) risk adjustment payment methodology. &nbsp;DOJ enforcement in the Medicare Advantage risk adjustment space overwhelmingly has proceeded civilly under the False Claims Act. Although the allegations suggest conduct far more troubling than prior civil cases under risk adjustment, these criminal charges&nbsp;... </p>]]></description>
</item>

			</channel></rss>