Categories: Uncategorized

Imagine there are two hospitals (or two physician groups). One is highly specialized and has developed a telemedicine program for treating stroke patients; the other is a community hospital or physician practice that would like to take part in this telemedicine program but does not want to pay for the technology needed to virtually connect with the program’s specialists.  Can the telemedicine provider buy this technology for the receiving hospital or physician group, or rent it out at a deep discount, without violating the law?

This turns out to be a hard question.  Under federal law, it is a criminal offense to knowingly and willfully pay another provider as an inducement or reward for referrals of items or services provided under federal health care programs, such as Medicare or Medicaid.   This is known as the Anti-Kickback Statute, and the penalties for violating it can be severe (see here and here).  There are exceptions to the Anti-Kickback Statute (referred to as safe harbors), but none of these are likely to apply in this context.

Determining whether an arrangement violates the Anti-Kickback Statute is largely a question of intent. In reviewing payment arrangements among providers, government enforcers are primarily interested in whether one of both of the parties intended for the payment to serve as an inducement or reward for referrals.  These determinations are based on a review of the facts and circumstances surrounding the payment or payments.

In September, 2011 the Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General (“OIG”) concluded in an Advisory Opinion that one such arrangement involving payments by a telemedicine provider to a participating provider would not violate the Anti-Kickback Statute.  Although like all OIG advisory opinions, this opinion is fact specific and only speaks to the legality of the specific payment arrangement that it addresses, the opinion shows how the OIG may analyze similar type arrangements under the Anti-Kickback Statute.

The Advisory Opinion examined whether a health system with a strong reputation for neuroscience care could cover certain program expenses (including the technology expense) that a community hospital would have to incur in order to participate in the health system’s telemedicine program for stroke patients.  In the Advisory Opinion, the OIG noted the following facts and circumstances as supportive of its determination that this specific arrangement would not be an illegal kickback:

  • The participating hospital would not be under any pressure to refer patients to the health system as a condition for participating in the telemedicine program, and would not be providing its physicians additional compensation for their involvement in the telemedicine program;

 

  • The health system anticipated that its stroke telemedicine program would  result in a reduction in the number of transfers of simple stroke cases that it would receive;

 

  • Physicians at hospitals participating in the telemedicine program would not be restricted from referring stroke patients to facilities other than the health system;

 

  • The selection of participating hospitals would be driven by access-to-care considerations  and not the participating hospital’s ability to generate referrals or other business for the health system;

 

  • The telemedicine program would be promoting best practices by assisting hospitals in providing treatment for stroke patients immediately upon their arrival in the emergency room;

 

  • Each party would be responsible for the costs associated with its own marketing activities; and

 

  • The arrangement would unlikely to result in increased costs to Medicare or Medicaid, in part because the consultations provided by the health system would not be billable to Medicare, and also because the telemedicine program would likely reduce transfers of stroke patients to the health system.

Although the Advisory Opinion is based on a particular set of facts and circumstances, it provides insight on how government enforcers are likely to view similar type arrangements and shows that legal pathways do exist for providing financial assistance to entities that would like to participate in a telemedicine program. Nonetheless, telemedicine program operators looking to offer such financial assistance should proceed cautiously and with an eye toward the Anti-Kickback Statute, for there is an element of risk here that unfortunately cannot be avoided.

 

 

 

Back to Health Law Advisor Blog

Search This Blog

Blog Editors

Related Services

Topics

Archives

Jump to Page

Subscribe

Sign up to receive an email notification when new Health Law Advisor posts are published:

Privacy Preference Center

When you visit any website, it may store or retrieve information on your browser, mostly in the form of cookies. This information might be about you, your preferences or your device and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to. The information does not usually directly identify you, but it can give you a more personalized web experience. Because we respect your right to privacy, you can choose not to allow some types of cookies. Click on the different category headings to find out more and change our default settings. However, blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience of the site and the services we are able to offer.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable information.

Performance Cookies

These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not know when you have visited our site, and will not be able to monitor its performance.